1 of 2
1
New study comparing high and low intensity exercise effects
Posted: 22 July 2011 09:11 PM   [ Ignore ]  
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  168
Joined  2011-06-17

Title:  THE EFFECT OF 8 WEEKS OF HIGH AND LOW INTENSITY RESISTANCE TRAINING OF THE SAME VOLUME ON FAT FREE MASS; FAT PERCENT; BODY MASS INDEX (BMI); AND FAT DISTRIBUTION OF YOUNG UNTRAINED MEN
Author:  Hamed Safaeian Boldaji ; Hamid Mohebi ; Farhad Rahmani nia
Abstract:  The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of 8 weeks of high and low intensityresistance training of the same volume on fat free mass; fat percent; Body Mass Index(BMI);and fat distribution of young untrained men. For this purpose; 24 young untrained men age21.79±2.78 years old; height 174±0.73 cm; and weight 69.79±9.9 kg; mean±SD participated inthis study as subjects. After the initial measuring; the subjects were divided in 3 groups of highintensity (85% of 1RM)(n=8); low intensity( 45% of 1RM)(n=8) and control group(n=8) andtrained for 8 weeks. The results of this study show that after 8 weeks of resistance training; leanbody mass increased and body fat percent decreased in both training groups significantly)P≤0.05( which in both cases the difference between the training groups was not significant. Theabdominal to thigh subcutaneous fat ratio and BMI did not changed significantly in bothintensities. According to the findings of this study it can be concluded that if the volume of high and low intensity resistance training be the same; then the effects on fat free mass; fat percent;Body Mass Index; and subcutaneous fat distribution will be probably the same.
Journal:  Electronic Physician
Issn:  20085842
EIssn: 
Year:  2011
Volume:  3
Issue:  3
pages/rec.No:  178-178
Keywords   Fat Free Mass ; Body Mass Index ; Subcutaneous Fat Distribution

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 July 2011 03:04 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]  
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1115
Joined  2008-07-28

I am not sure if that journal is peer reviewed. Couldn’t find it in pubmed.

 Signature 

Exercise Biology - The Science of Exercise & Nutrition

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 July 2011 03:17 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]  
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  168
Joined  2011-06-17

http://www.doaj.org/doaj?func=abstract&id=784428

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 July 2011 07:29 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]  
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  913
Joined  2009-03-25

they were untrained

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 July 2011 02:32 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]  
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1115
Joined  2008-07-28

Not in pubmed, and I don’t think it is peer reviewed.

 Signature 

Exercise Biology - The Science of Exercise & Nutrition

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 July 2011 06:33 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 5 ]  
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  168
Joined  2011-06-17

Some of the authors past Pubmed works.

High-intensity endurance training improves adiponectin mRNA and plasma concentrations.
Moghadasi M, Mohebbi H, Rahmani-Nia F, Hassan-Nia S, Noroozi H, Pirooznia N.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011 Jul 17. [Epub ahead of print]
PMID: 21769734 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Exercise training intensity/volume affects plasma and tissue adiponectin concentrations in the male rat.
Garekani ET, Mohebbi H, Kraemer RR, Fathi R.
Peptides. 2011 May;32(5):1008-12. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
PMID: 21291933 [PubMed - in process]

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 July 2011 07:15 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 6 ]  
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  203
Joined  2010-04-11

The directory of open access journals lists per reviewed open access journals, according to wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directory_of_Open_Access_Journals


http://www.ephysician.ir/ says they are peer reviewed.

So it seems it might be peer reviewed.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 July 2011 08:59 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 7 ]  
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  168
Joined  2011-06-17

Load for motor unit activation perhaps doesn’t need to be very high. Sorry if this has been posted before.

Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1987;15:95-151.
Influence of exercise and training on motor unit activation.
Sale DG.
Abstract
Human MUs vary considerably in twitch force, contractile speed, axonal conduction velocity, fatigue resistance, recruitment thresholds, firing rates, and firing patterns. These functional properties, together with the corresponding morphological characteristics such as soma size, axon diameter, and muscle fiber size, are interrelated. The smallest (soma size, axon diameter, muscle fiber size) MUs have the smallest twitch force, the slowest contraction speed, the slowest conduction velocity, the greatest resistance to fatigue, the lowest recruitment thresholds, and the lowest minimum and maximum firing rates. The converse applies to the largest MUs. Between the extremes are MUs with intermediate characteristics. MUs are generally recruited in order of size in voluntary contraction of increasing force or effort. Thus, units are recruited in order of increasing twitch force and contractile speed and decreasing resistance to fatigue. In some muscles MU recruitment occurs throughout the range of contraction force, whereas in other muscles most if not all MUs are recruited by about 50% of maximum contraction force. The latter pattern is characteristic of small muscles that perform precise movements. The recruitment order of MUs according to size is based on the inverse relation between susceptibility to discharge and motoneuron size. Thus, for evenly distributed and increasing excitatory synaptic input to a pool of motoneurons, smaller motoneurons will begin to fire before larger motoneurons. This arrangement ensures, for example, that the small, fatigue-resistant MUs will be preferentially activated in prolonged, low-intensity exercise, to which these units are most suited. In brief, intense exercise, the associated greater excitatory input will also recruit the large MUs, taking advantage of their greater strength and contractile speed. A frequent question is whether rapid, ballistic or explosive contractions and movements are associated with selective or preferential recruitment of large, fast twitch MUs. There is evidence of synaptic input systems that preferentially excite large, fast twitch MUs and inhibit small twitch MUs; however, the majority of evidence from human experiments indicates that the recruitment order is not reversed in ballistic contractions. For technical reasons, most studies have used isometric contractions, but recently successful recordings of single MUs have been made during locomotion. Future research must develop a successful recording arrangement for the study of recruitment and discharge properties of single MUs in large proximal muscles during activities such as kicking, jumping, and throwing.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 July 2011 09:03 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 8 ]  
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  203
Joined  2010-04-11

The bold part is a bit out of context, if you read what is just before and after it says that this goes for small muscles, while other muscles see new recruitment pretty much throughout the intensity range (this is the typical 80% of 1RM we hear about all the time)

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 July 2011 09:10 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 9 ]  
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  168
Joined  2011-06-17

Perhaps another interesting paper? http://www.springerlink.com/content/78226q5u2h881404/

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 July 2011 09:24 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 10 ]  
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  168
Joined  2011-06-17

Another possibly related paper.                                                      Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2002, 16(1), 123–128
Effects of Low-Intensity Resistance Exercise With
Short Interset Rest Period on Muscular Function
in Middle-Aged Women
YUDAI TAKARADA AND NAOKATA ISHII

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 July 2011 09:32 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 11 ]  
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  168
Joined  2011-06-17

May relate.

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01178.x/abstract

Myogenic response of human skeletal muscle to 12 weeks of resistance training at light loading intensity

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 July 2011 10:32 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 12 ]  
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1115
Joined  2008-07-28

That’s a good one. In fact, I wanted to write a review about this study.

It seems like there is more and more evidence to show light weight may work. I saw one when I went to the NSCAS conference presented by Chad Kerksick. I will review it later this week.

I just get the feel that most of these studies are done on begiiners and in leg musculature. And I do suspect this might be population and a muscle specific effect. But I am not sure.

Thanks for all the links, near60lifter. What’s your name by the way?

 Signature 

Exercise Biology - The Science of Exercise & Nutrition

Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 July 2011 01:10 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 13 ]  
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  168
Joined  2011-06-17

Message removed.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 July 2011 08:03 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 14 ]  
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  168
Joined  2011-06-17

Another related study?
Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research May 2002 - Volume 16 - Issue 2
Effect of 5, 10, and 20 Repetition Maximums on the Recovery of Voluntary and Evoked Contractile Properties
BEHM, DAVID G.; REARDON, GREGORY; FITZGERALD, JAMES; DRINKWATER, ERIC
Abstract
Maximal strength training has been reported to emphasize neural adaptations. The main objective of this study was to detect differences in muscle activation between 5, 10, and 20 repetition maximum (RM) sets. Fourteen subjects performed elbow flexion with 5, 10, and 20RM. Subjects were tested for maximum isometric force (maximal voluntary contraction [MVC]), twitch amplitude (peak twitch [Pt]), time to peak twitch (TPT), half relaxation time (1/2 RT), electromyography (EMG), and muscle activation (interpolated twitch). Subjects were tested preexercise and 30 seconds, 1, 2, and 3 minutes postexercise. There were no significant differences in MVC, muscle activation, or antagonist/agonist EMG after 5, 10, or 20RM. However, greater RM did have a greater detrimental effect on twitch properties than fewer RM. Peak twitch was significantly (p = 0.004) less (32.08%) for the 20 than for the 5RM, whereas TPT shortened (p < 0.05) by 7.3 and 11.1% with 10 and 20RM vs. 5RM, respectively. Half relaxation time at 20RM was shortened (p < 0.05) by 20.6 and 25.4% compared with that at 5 and 10RM, respectively. MVC, muscle activation, and temporal twitch properties did not recover within 3 minutes of recovery. In conclusion, whereas 5RM did not produce greater muscle inactivation, twitch contractile properties were affected to a greater degree by a higher number of RM.

I believe that Behm and his colleagues concluded that the popular opinion that a resistance heavier than 6RM would produce greater increases in neural drive was not found true in this study.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 July 2011 08:26 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 15 ]  
Sr. Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  168
Joined  2011-06-17

Another possibly related study?
http://www.springerlink.com/content/t96qmxyaa7x7le0c/

Profile
 
 
   
1 of 2
1