Hi, all
I was looking into old KAATSU training studies and pay attention to the fact that
the ST fibers hypertrophy were much greater then FT fibers in a contrary to traditional weight training
Is this might be connected to the evidence that almost all hypertrophy achieved by KAATSU is sarcoplasmic fluff?

Which study is it, Anatoly? Have a link?

No, my mistake. sorry

http://www.profedf.ufpr.br/rodackibiomecanica_arquivos/Cross-sectional area after two weeks kaatsu Yasuda 2005.pdf

I referring to this one, but confuse with fiber types

“Mean changes in quadriceps muscle CSA was 7.8%
for LIT-KAATSU and 1.8% for LIT.  Changes in muscle fiber CSA was 5.9% for type-I and 27.6%
(p<0.05) for type-II in the LIT-KAATSU, and -2.1% and 0.5%, respectively, in the LIT.”

seems to me type II increased much more here.