Recent partials study
Posted: 15 June 2017 06:35 AM   [ Ignore ]  
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1137
Joined  2009-03-25

http://journals.lww.com/nsca-jscr/Abstract/publishahead/Partial_range_of_motion_exercise_is_effective_for.95936.aspx

Results looks odd

Profile
 
 
Posted: 22 June 2017 11:04 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]  
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1410
Joined  2008-07-28

Hi Anatoly,

Sorry I didn’t see this. Not much activity these days hence don’t check.

From what I have seen, it is usually the other way around. I haven’t read the full text yet. So even if this is true, it needs to be replicated a few times.
If they equalized volume, I hope the partial group is using much higher weight than the full ROM group.

I will upload the full text here later today.

Thanks Anatoly!

 Signature 

Exercise Biology - The Science of Exercise & Nutrition

Profile
 
 
Posted: 22 June 2017 05:15 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]  
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1137
Joined  2009-03-25

Actually, Im curious about huge CSA increases claimed in abstract, about 50% in 8 weeks, in trained

Profile
 
 
Posted: 25 June 2017 01:03 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]  
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1410
Joined  2008-07-28

I haven’t got the full text. My comp is going crazy.

But I am pretty sure they are reporting within group improvements. Usually, the difference reported is between-groups. Within group improvements are usually pretty large, but have issues with regression to the mean and such. I want to see how they did the statistical analysis

 Signature 

Exercise Biology - The Science of Exercise & Nutrition

Profile