Just to add….
I do think bigger muscles will lead to strength increases. However, I just wanted to point out that gaining strength - even as an advanced trainee - doesn’t mean bigger muscles necessarily. Never underestimate the CNS factor. 
Is Muscle Mass Important For Power Lifters?
April 28 2010
Powerlifters are usually looked as strong athletes with little muscle compared to bodybuilders. A recent study looked to see what differentiates the weaker lifters from stronger lifters.
What Is Power Lifting?
Three Lifts: Powerfliting involves three basic lifts the Bench Press, Deadlift & Squats. Olympic lifting, on the other hand, involves the clean and jerk and snatch.
1RM: It means one repetition /maximum or the maximum amount of weight that you can lift for one rep.
The person who can do the most amount of weight for 1 rep (1RM) wins the competition. Basically, the strongest person wins the competition.
Muscle not important for power lifters?
Most people think powerlifting or strength has nothing to do with muscle . A few reason why they think are:
Powerlifters are Fat: Bodybuilders are muscular and ripped. So people think it is the training that makes them look like that.
Heavier Weights: Powerlifters usually train with very low reps (1-3) and hence the weight they lift is almost double what they can do if they did 8-10 reps.
Bodybuilders usually train with high reps (8-12) and the weight they use are much lighter. So people think strength is not really related to muscle.
Nervous system: Strength is all about nervous system adaptations and has little to do with muscle.
A recent study looked to see if muscle mass can predict powerlfiting performance.
What was the study design?
The study compared weaker lifters and stronger powerlifters who had competed in powerlifting competitions. None of the lifters tested positive in drug test in the past 2 years.
Stronger lifters were defined as lifters whose wilks score were greater than 417 here as the weaker group were defined as lifters who had a wilks score of less than 370.
They compared anthropometric characteristics like limb lengths, muscle girths, bone breadth and muscle mass.
What were the Study Results?
The study showed that the majority of the significant differences were for muscle mass and muscular girths per unit height and the greater muscle mass contributed to the greater strength levels in stronger lifters.
The study recommends powerlifters should spent more time training to the development of muscle mass most relevant to the three lifts.
Practical Applications
• Strength is highly correlated with muscle mass. You cannot magically gain strength without putting on muscle or vice-versa.
• If your strength is climbing, you are definitely gaining muscle too.
Related Articles
Anoop | Mon July 19, 2010
Hi Dave,
Thanks for the comment and I do agree that strength has a strong neural component. All I am saying that the neural compoenent plateu and soon you will have to tap into your muscles to keep your strength increasing.
Here is a quote from Digby Sale - one of the pioneers in neural adaptations research - “After years of training, I suspect that there is little or no neural adaptation that can increase strength further, apart from a change in technique. Strength in the highly trained state is almost entirely a function of muscle mass. This would explain why athletes ultimately resort to anabolic steroids - increasing muscle mass is the only way to increase strength further (Personal Communication)”
Norcal Rich | Fri October 08, 2010
I have some experience in high school wrestling, and this reminds me a little of comparing the lower weight divisions with the heavyweights. The lower weight divisions try to make the lowest weight class possible, and almost always under 10% bodyfat, sometimes much lower (<4% bf). They looked ripped.
The heavyweights, on the other hand, generally have slacker-looking muscles, big but not well-defined. But they are beastly strong.
Part of the difference is that so much of wrestling strength is in the hips, and thus not easy to see. But the difference in appearance is, I think, due to the heavyweights’ use of very heavy weights/low reps, and a higher fat content of the muscles, more like a powerlifter, while lighter weight wrestlers use higher rep/lower weight, producing more tone, and they have less fat on and in the muscles.
Might this tone, combined with NO-enhancing and creatine supplements, make the bodybuilders look bigger for their strength levels than the powerlifters?
Anoop | Fri October 08, 2010
Hi Norcal,
Correlation do not mean causation. It could very weel be that skinny guys were skinny to begin with and heavier guys were heavy to begin with.
Training and exercise has very little to do with how toned you look. It is usually your diet and genetics.
Sprinters look muscular because they had more Type 2 fibers to begin with and were more suited to short burst of activity and hence gravitated towards sprinting.The same for long distance runners runners.
All good questions!
Norcal, The rep scheme and weight used has minimal effect on the body composition of the athlete. Olympic weightlifters in ligther classes cary very little bodyfat, and yet train with weights in the 1-3 rep range, sometimes up to 5. It has more to do with the metabolism, body type, endocrine system, frame etc of the individual.
The rep scheme will basically train your muscles to be strong in that rep range. If you are competing in a 1 rep max contest, then you should probably get used to training with 1 rep loads. If you are in a sport that demands more muscular endurance, you should probably use higher reps in your training. Genetics will determine you potential for certain types of strength.
Another thing to keep in mind is the strength continuum. It is an analogue scale from absolute strength to absolute speed. Each side builds on the opposite side. You cannot move huge weights without being fast, and you cannot be explosively fast without being very strong. A powerlifter may look slow when doing a 1 rep max, but his nervous system is driving the weight not only as hard as possible, but as fast as possible too.
The reason bodybuilders use lighter weights and higher reps is to increase sarcoplasmic hypertrophy, as well as handle the huge volume that their already muscular bodies need to add more muscle. What would be safer for a depleted dieting bodybuilder to do: 30 overall sets of 10-15? or 100 sets of 1 rep. Often, pro bodybuilder, especially ones on steroids, are so strong, that many of the exercises just become too dangerous to do on a regular basis for the volume that they require.
It’s still better to think of things in terms of “getting stronger builds muscle” instead of “building muscle makes you stronger”. Bodybuilders are a bad role model for an average joe to emulate, even if his goals are the same.
the CNS plays a HUGE role in gaining strength over mass. I should know I started powerlifting at a BWT of 145lbs with a 120lb 1RM now i have a 270lb 1RM and 152lb BWT. You NEVER have to gain muscle mass to gain strength the platue is all in your head. How do you explain Alex Pocu`s 435lb RAW bench @ 145lbs BWT? He trained for years with steady strength gains never leaving that weight class
Anoop | Thu October 13, 2011
Thanks for the comment.
We have talked about all this in the previous comments. And it is not just ‘cns’ that is helping a powerlifter. It is the same cns that works when a bodybuilder workout too. How come they don’t see such strength increase?
Joe Nicholson | Sat January 14, 2012
I guess it all depends on what kind of muscle mass increase we are talking about. There is a huge difference between sarcoplasmic hypertrophy and myofibral hypertrophy. Sarcoplasmic hypertrophy is conducive to size increases yet does nothing for strength since it does nothing to increase the actual size of the muscle fibers. Myofibral hypertrophy will result in an increase in strength as the contractile fibers are actually increasing in size. However, myofibral hypertrophy is much harder to come by and it results in far less increase in size. It’s a lot easier to blow your arm measurement up by pumping and increasing sarcoplasm than it is to actually increase the size of your muscle fibers enough to make a significant size improvent. I say focus on strength increases and real muscle mass (myofibral hypertrophy) and take whatever size comes with it. Being big without the strength to back it up makes you into a walking joke.
Anoop | Sat January 14, 2012
Hi Joe,
Thanks Joe for the comment.
Sarcoplasmic hypertrophy is limited by your myofibrilar hypertrophy. And it is just water, glycogen and such.
And who really cares how much you bench on a bodybuilding stage?
